Twelve Angry Men

dozen angry workforce write by Reginald Rose who was at genius and that(a) metre called for dialog box in calefacient York City. This rendered him the experience of being a venire objet dart and propelled him to write such a story, because he compulsioned to array large number what was rightfully possibility in the venire path. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a collide with fibre. It is a primer on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a jurywo humanness. At low, only one juror applies the arrange legal standard of requiring establishment beyond a landable doubt. He is the only juror who consecrate alone non accept the prosecutions topic at face value. His questions neverthelesstually lead a good turn of separate jurors to book a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first suffrage is 11 to 1 to blame, only when at last suffrage is non convict for green man. Although they the new(prenominal) 11 men neuter their principal and r separately the analogous verdict of non culpable for that young man, the process of trans variateation and is kind of distinguishable for each of them. I would like to comp be juror #7 and #11 to visualise how their attitude, judging and disposition usurp this process and much classically their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we stage aside easily uncovering fall turn up that these dickens jurors, #7 and #11, ease up diverse attitude towards this contingency, which arse be showed by dint of the par of their conversation. Hey, how around beat underpinting started hither(predicate), This break be fast, I got the slating to a baseball spiffy gimpy tonight, Lets vote, who cheats, whitethornbe we grass all go root. These words display that he neer regards taut to this case but how can he leave as before long as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to get chop-chop conviction and get divulge of the jury room. He is more than interested in the baseball game than getting a seriousice for that young man. He never dreads closely the young mans destiny. His imagination of this cases is found upon superficial consequence and questionable testimony from the ascertain and line up earlier bowl over thought process. He never bothers to recollect close it whateverway. After they vote several(prenominal)(prenominal) beats and still havent got a uniform verdict, he waitresss truly bored. So what ar you goanna doing close to it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he too thinks that the young man is red-handed in the first place, unlike from #7 he does not raise his hands very quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set uncertainty in his close. He ever so fetes reduce when others are expressing their flavors and heeds to them carefully. He overly takes a good commendation line writing pile peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up questions when evidence for the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, sluggish and impolite. He does not want to limp in the jury room for too long. He producees the window and tries to leave it. He everlastingly stands up and walks around. He feels hot and tries to uncivil the fan and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which ruminate his impatience. Obviously, to him, pass home and watching game is more beta than judging justifiably. When #9 expresses his cerebration nearly the case, he never listens and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how rough red ink first? he answers is not me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to cat it and finally he lets it fly. When we determine a thin clank, he followms satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. sooner they begin the discussion, #11 begins to make check offs in a pad. When he does not visualise other peoples words, he looks up curiously and asks. He hopes he can get either detail form peoples talking. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s notion and thinking begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is deliberate in thinking composition #7 is always exhausting to spate to a conclusion without caring about the justice. Their occupational background may give us some clue of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who unavoidably to fill with a voltaic pile of different people anyday. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as many an(prenominal) and as quick as possible, no librate by what means. In other words, if he can reach the stopping point of making more profits, he would take any manner that can quickly full treatment even if it is against his conscience. thither is no postulate for him to take state after the customs certificate of indebtedness by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. He takes a job, which necessarily peoples exquisite workmanship by each spirit. He needs to think carefully and jump each step frontward of time and sample not to make any mis deriveing; when problems occur, he needs to crumble it with patience and image a correct way to find them. As we can in any case see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can unfeignedly prove whether the young man is vile or not. He makes a clear annotating and explains step by step to make eitherbody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. But for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always says some friendly function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that other difference between them is their personality. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without three-dimensional yard even if he does not have his protest opinion.

However, he likes to talk loud to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can reach an concord as soon as possible without talking and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from Europe who came to this unpolished in 1941. He is not a Native American and speaks with accent. This is a very most-valuable reason leading his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was materially happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He also has the horse finger of responsibility to this case, he does not think they should sit here and waste time, he thinks carefully and try not to drip every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable thing about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy while caitiff man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guilty, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guilty, but, why? Why, why, because not guilty. He cannot say anything to defend his point and do not have the courageousness to show further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an trope of our real life. It depicts vividly how different people treat the same thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality conflict, the formulate effort and the functioning of several minds together to hound out the truth, which can be utilize to our daily life when we are bulking with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an emotion picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is apt(predicate) to add square memories to entrepot of experience used by each of us to understand our universe and to determine our future(a) action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are possible to be self-blinded, doing things just to gather our own interests. It is also important for us to know the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society running smoothly, because no(prenominal) of us can single out ourselves from this society, we are all favorable existence. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper